Comments on: Ampere DGX Servers Pack A Wallop, Including AMD Epyc CPUs https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/ In-depth coverage of high-end computing at large enterprises, supercomputing centers, hyperscale data centers, and public clouds. Thu, 13 Jun 2024 03:28:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: Timothy Prickett Morgan https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144374 Fri, 15 May 2020 14:01:50 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144374 In reply to Mark.

<> Yup.

]]>
By: Timothy Prickett Morgan https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144373 Fri, 15 May 2020 14:01:21 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144373 In reply to Navin.

Deepest apologies. I was thinking about the CPU. Moving fast.

]]>
By: Timothy Prickett Morgan https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144372 Fri, 15 May 2020 14:00:39 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144372 In reply to BlackDove.

It is a good question, and I suggested that a few years back. I think IBM wants to sell its own AC922 and the wonder is why there are not larger and fatter Power Systems machines with NVSwitches. Gotta figure IBM doesn’t think there is margin in that, but I can’t imagine that this is correct. The other thing is that using Power9 chips would mean burning some of the NVLink ports for the GPU interconnect on the CPU-GPU interconnect, and that would reduce the GPU count in a single image. Maybe NVLink 2.0 is not as important for hosts as is PCI-Express 4.0 and PCI-Express switches to link CPUs to GPUs is, in fact, good enough.

]]>
By: BlackDove https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144369 Fri, 15 May 2020 12:11:44 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144369 In reply to Skynet.

Why doesn’t Nvidia use IBM POWER CPUs in their DGX servers? Are the host CPUs that unimportant?

With POWER9 scale up they could have 8TB in 2 sockets and have NVLink on the CPUs as well with no PCIe switches needed.

]]>
By: Navin https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144356 Fri, 15 May 2020 04:50:21 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144356 Without further ado, let’s start with the new DGX A100 system, and you will note that AMD has done away with the number designation for its DGX server generations

Please fix typo 🙂 (yes, i work for nvidia, but am not involved on any PR / marketing, i read this website purely out my own interest)

]]>
By: Mark https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144351 Fri, 15 May 2020 02:35:43 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144351 “and you will note that AMD has done away with the number designation for its DGX server generations” -> I think AMD should read Nvidia here?

Very exciting times we are living in for HPC :).
Good article!

]]>
By: hpcguy https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144339 Thu, 14 May 2020 23:42:11 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144339 the main problem with NVIDIA is the ecosystem…and vendor lockin. If you get into it will be a nightmare to get out. New and better approaches will come and you’ll stuck with your CUDA directives…

]]>
By: Skynet https://www.nextplatform.com/2020/05/14/ampere-dgx-servers-pack-a-wallop-including-amd-epyc-cpus/#comment-144324 Thu, 14 May 2020 18:59:36 +0000 http://www.nextplatform.com/?p=136458#comment-144324 In 2034 the playstation 7 will have that same power… And we will all live in the Matrix in 8K VR 240hz!

]]>